Once again, thank you for your work on this. The first release is always the hardest because nobody has done the helpful stuff like adding a jake task for RAT - great stuff!
I've not reviewed the package at this point, but based on the fact I did a thorough review of the last package I'm all for you putting this up for a vote. Ross -----Original Message----- From: Tim Barham [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [DISCUSS] Ripple release 0.9.29 Based on feedback from our last attempt at a release, I believe the only change we *need* to make for a release is to reinstate the XMLHttpRequest.js license in LICENSE, updating it to point to the correct version (that was released under the Apache 2.0). However, we've also had some useful fixes over the weeks since 0.9.28, so it will be nice to include them. In addition to those changes, I've done the following today: 1. Merged Julian's PR that updates our bower and jsdom so Ripple successfully installs and builds with Node 0.11.0 and higher. 2. Added a new jake task - 'jake rat' - that runs Apache RAT to verify license headers in the project (verifies all files that should have license headers do, that they recognized, and of a type acceptable in an Apache project). This will make it easier for team members to verify a release is clean in this regard (note that since it runs against your local repo, you need to sync your repo to the release tag the run). Running 'jake rat' should be completely clean at this point, as I've configured it to exclude files with license headers it doesn't recognize, but that we have agreed are fine. 3. Updated package.json and doc/CHANGELOG.md for version 0.9.29 and added a 0.9.29 tag. I've created an archive package if anyone wants to check it out, but haven't done any verification on it yet. It can be found here: http://1drv.ms/1J7SY3v. Anyone have any issues with moving forward with a vote thread for this release? Thanks! Tim
