Right so probably the best thing to do is get a couple of other opinions. Write a note up, point a few of us at the code and see what we think.
On 10 February 2011 23:26, Patricia Shanahan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2/10/2011 3:22 PM, Dan Creswell wrote: > ... > > So I would say, add the more stressful versions and don't worry about the >> time to test too much equally, don't expect to surface all concurrency >> bugs >> this way. >> > ... > > Indeed, the next question is what to do about cases where I strongly > suspect a concurrency bug based on code reading, but have no failing test > case at all. > > Patricia >
