As I recall, while the code was still at Sun, there were thoughts about making 
Mahalo XA-compliant.

And as more general comment, taking into account both comments on Outrigger, 
and the TransactionManager, perhaps there should be an effort to look at all 
the default services supplied with River, with a view to seeing what the 
shortcomings are and addressing them in River, rather than showing them as 
'just an example of a Transaction Service, etc.', because in the main, most 
users won't reimplement the standard services.

--Calum

On 10 Feb 2011, at 16:49, Gregg Wonderly wrote:

> 
> I'd personally have a great desire to have TransactionManager be a focus of 
> some effort to try and finish getting its behavior to be dependable and 
> consistent for a single process service.

Reply via email to