I've never had a problem with bitbucket.org, which is Mercurial and has a nice wiki and bug tracker. I don't know if it ticks all your boxes though.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Dan Creswell <dan.cresw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nope, SF does Git and Mercurial as well. Blitz was on svn, then went hg and > is now git.... > > On 11 February 2011 09:29, De Groot, Cees <cdegr...@marktplaats.nl> wrote: > >> Sourceforge still is Subversion and CVS, isn't it? >> >> I usually use GitHub for my open source stuff. Seems to be fine. Also >> Gitorious, which has the added benefit of being open source itself so if you >> like it, you just grab it and install it :) >> >> On 11Feb, 2011, at 09:48 , Calum Shaw-Mackay wrote: >> >> > All - >> > >> > I'm at the beginning of moving all my Jini-related projects away from >> java.net. >> > >> > Does anyone have any opinions on which particular 'brand' of project >> hosting is a 'good one'? (in whatever terms you define that) >> > >> > Immediate considerations are sourceforge, and GitHub (although I've not >> yet used GitHub), but there may be different services >> > that others have found to be better. >> > >> > Thanks in advance >> > >> > Calum >> >> >
