Thanks everybody for the replies. I believe it is for the best (for now), I agree with Jeff (and with all the other comments) and I will try to make the mentioned changes after locking it down *.
Jeff, it was my pleasure giving the contribution I could. Thanks ! *: After all, the necessary material is already at the Apache River site. On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jeff Ramsdale <[email protected]>wrote: > Luis, > > My opinion is there should be a prominent message on the site pointing > to Apache River (and then lock it down). I know I've talked to some > folks who don't recognize the good going on here because of the > indirection. I would be in favor of reconstituting the site in the > future if there can be a plan (and volunteers) to help with upkeep, > but for now the reality is the effort is going into River proper (hard > to complain about that). > > Also, I'd like to publicly thank you for your years of work in helping > protect the site. > > -jeff > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Luis Matta <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am re-sending this e-mail as a last change for an answer kind of thing > :) > > Please if you have any interess in Jini.org, help me decide wheter to > lock > > it for edition or not. > > > > The site has served for at least 3 years only as a target to SPAMM, what > > should be done? Should I lock it, > > or does the community need it open? > > > > Many Thanks > > Luís > > >
