According to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html:
"Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to
provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate
regardless of their geographic locations."
I read "next release" as meaning the release after the one we are voting on.
Patricia
On 7/1/2011 4:08 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
"next release" being 2.2.0 or 2.2.1?
I would still like to release 2.2.0 as-is with a nicer-to-build (and better
docs on running the tests!) coming very soon after as 2.2.1.
Exactly how long do we need to leave the voting open for anyway?
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.
On 1 Jul 2011 12:01, "Peter"<j...@zeus.net.au> wrote:
You made a valid point about compiling and first impressions.
We should make a point of getting the next release out soon with better
build and test instructions.
Cheers,
Peter.
----- Original message -----
I'm going to have limited e-mail access (iPhone only) for the next few
hours.
If our incubator space is about to go away, maybe we should shove this
one out the door, for the sake of the better binaries and having a top
level release, and then produce 2.2.1 ASAP to clean up the loose ends.
Patricia
On 6/30/2011 6:54 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The build is clean if the classes are removed. At least one QA test
fails. That is why I suggested as an alternative fix removing the two
classes and skipping the failing test.
Patricia
On 6/30/2011 6:32 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Would modifying the build instructions help? And also raising a Jira
to fix
later.
I'm keen to get this release out, obviously. But like you say, bad
first
impressions do leave a lingering bad feel.
how does the build fail with the removed classes?
Cheers,
Tom
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging
via
mobile device.
On 30 Jun 2011 14:12, "Patricia Shanahan"<p...@acm.org> wrote:
On 6/30/2011 1:42 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 30-06-11 10:12, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Actually, lets have a proper vote thread.
Release the artifacts 2.2.0 which can be found in
http://river.apache.org/~thobbs/river?
+1 Peter Firmstone
+1 Tom Hobbs
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of
messaging
via
mobile device.
+1 release early, release often!
-0
I don't like releasing with source code that does not compile
following
the build instructions in the release. It creates a bad first
impression
for anyone interested in the source code. I would like to see the
build
instructions updated, NameServiceImpl changed to be 1.5 compatible,
and
have an opportunity to test the new build instructions.
On the other hand, the release does get better code into the hands
of
people who are only interested in the binary.
I realize my negative vote is only symbolic. Three positive votes
are
enough to permit a release to go out.
Patricia
