Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I've read the document, and am thinking about its implications.
I am not a trademark enforcer. I have no training as a trademark
enforcer, and no interest in learning to be one. I did not understand
that joining the PMC meant becoming a trademark enforcer.
Patricia
I must admit I didn't either at the time. From memory, Sim suggested
earlier that we should treat committer and PMC member status separately,
I think he was right.
Perhaps in future when we offer someone committer status, we should
point them to the relevant PMC document and ask them if they'd like to
be a PMC member also.
It is my understanding that a committer doesn't have to be a PMC member,
but a PMC member must be a committer, is that correct?
Peter.
On 7/19/2011 1:28 PM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
This is primarily an email for the PMC. Can you all please ensure
that you read the PMC Branding Responsibilities page [1].
Can you please reply to this page when you've done so. Making sure
we've all read it is needs to form part of our next board report.
Cheers,
Tom
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility.html
