That'll teach me.

This was me moving from private@ to @dev but not editing the email well
enough.  I did make the rest of the suggested edits though.



Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.

On 9 Aug 2011 20:30, "Christopher Dolan" <christopher.do...@avid.com> wrote:
> Sure, go ahead and move the discussion to dev@.
>
> :-)
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Hobbs [mailto:tvho...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 2:20 PM
> To: dev@river.apache.org
> Subject: [DRAFT][REPORT] River Board Report August 2011
>
> Comments always welcome, due date is 15th August.
>
> Sent to private@ because I thought there might be a couple of things
> that should remain so.  I'm happy to move it onto dev@ if people think
> that's unnecessary.
>
> Below is the August board report for River
>
> Apache River is a distributed computing architecture, based on the JSK
> Starter Kit Source code donated by Sun Microsystems, for the Jini
> Specification.
>
> Releases:
> Our first TLP release (2.2.0) was finally made available on 28th July.
> Progress:
> As usual, the community is there but activity on dev@ is pretty slow.
> There's usually a flurry of activity when one of our number manages to
> find sme time and get something done.  We believe this proves that,
> although small, the community exists and is still functioning well.
>
> Community:
> We made one invitation to committer/PMC status this period but it was
> implicitly turned down (no response to offer email). On the other
> hand, the arguments which plagued the early days of River aren't
> happening. We're also getting involvement from Jini old hands.
>
> Issues:
> No board issues at this time.
>
> Website/Trademark Checklist:
> - Project Website Basics : homepage is project.apache.org (COMPLETE)
> - Project Naming And Descriptions : use proper Apache forms, describe
> product, etc. (COMPLETE)
> - Website Navigation Links : navbar links included, link to
> www.apache.org included (COMPLETE)
> - Trademark Attributions : attribution for all ASF marks included in
> footers, etc. (INCOMPLETE, NOT CHECKED)
> - Logos and Graphics : include TM, use consistent product logo on your
> site (INCOMPLETE, NOT CHECKED)
> - Project Metadata : DOAP file checkedin and up to date (INCOMPLETE,
> NOT CHECKED)
>
> The board also asked to make sure that all PMC members had read the
> PMC trademark/branding responsibilities.  [1]  4/11 PMC members
> confirmed that they'd read it, although I suspect that some of the
> others had already read it given their involement with other Apache
> projects.  There was a very brief discussion that it wasn't
> immediately obvious/clear when signing up for PMC duties that
> "trademark enforcer" was part of the role.  It seemed a fair comment
> but I hope that by outlining the support provided by ASF we don't have
> to be legal experts in this field to be able to keep an eye on how
> other entities use the Apache River marks.
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility.html

Reply via email to