On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 13:07, Tom Hobbs wrote:
> I'm in a coffee shop with my lappy, so I can get this out for review,
> but someone else will have to submit it.
> 
> 
> Below is the August report for Apache River
> 
> Apache River is a distributed computing architecture, based on the JSK
> Starter Kit Source code donated by Sun Microsystems, for the Jini
> Specification.
> 
> Releases:
> No new releases since last report.  Work on fixing some issues for the
> next release is ongoing.
> 
> Branding:
> No issues to report.
> 
> Progress:
> Same few commits and activity taking place as before.
> 
Seems a little negative.  How about "The pace of commit activity remains
steady."

Speaking for myself, I've put quite a bit of work into the container
architecture (surrogate and non-surrogate) and hope to complete a
working container-based deployment environment as an alternative to the
"com.sun.jini.start" approach.  For what it's worth, the container as it
stands right now fires up and hosts the infrastructure services (Reggie
at least, although there's no reason it couldn't host others) and the
codebase http server.  I'm currently working on the mechanism to shut
down a service after startup so as to allow hot-deployment and
facilitate development.

I'm aiming to implement "deployment by copy", where you deploy a Jini
service provider simply by copying a service archive file into the
deployment directory, much like on Tomcat or JBoss.  Then it becomes
very easy to include that deployment in a build workflow, or even the
"build.xml" script inside a Netbeans project.

Once that's done, and there is some user documentation in place, I will
propose moving the container out from the "skunk" branch to become a
River deliverable, separate from the JTSK. The container depends on the
JTSK, obviously.  "Sub-project" seems too grandiose, but at the same
time I don't think the JTSK should contain everything in the project. 
I'm thinking that from the users' point of view, they shouldn't have to
deal with everything involved in the infrastructure.  They just want to
download a product and start developing applications with it.

Cheers,

Greg.

> Community:
> No issues to report.
> 
> Issues:
> No issues to report.

Reply via email to