Simon:
I had a look at your file. Personally, I see a more declarative approach in the future, but I always think that its up to the users to lead us onto the right path by using the approach that suits them best. As such, I'd encourage you to code it up and put it out there. I don't think that we should present any approach as "the one and only way", but one or more "good ways" should establish themselves in time. Cheers, Greg. On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 04:15, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote: > On 20-09-12 14:59, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote: > > > > I've commited a small piece of template code, describing a possible way > > to make it easy to use River. > > > > Of course it needs all kinds of features like event handlers, service > > selection criteria, etc. But i think this is what people would like as a > > interface to river. > > > > Gr. Simon > > > > Anybody cares to comment? > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/jtsk/trunk/netbeans/federation/src/org/apache/river/examples/federation/> > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/jtsk/trunk/netbeans/federation/src/org/apache/river/federation/Federation.java?revision=1388003&view=markup> > > > -- > QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl > Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
