And a ServiceUI that could do some JMX-based prodding of a service? On 29 October 2012 16:09, Gregg Wonderly <gr...@wonderly.org> wrote:
> I think that JMX could be used there. The bigger issue, is that from some > perspectives, having a JMX monitoring system already in place, makes it > more easy to do it with JMX. From the other perspective, having a standard > "Management/tuning/observing" ServiceUI roll makes it possible to trivially > integrate lots of different things into a single desktop experience. If > you have to solve the problem with JMX connectors "through the network", > then Jini should be doable as well. Internally, we could suggest that JMX > be used, but then provide a connector which is not remote, but proxied to, > by a standard Jini service interface. > > Gregg > > On Oct 29, 2012, at 3:12 AM, Dan Creswell <dan.cresw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sounds more like a job for JMX to me.... > > > > On 29 October 2012 00:06, Gregg Wonderly <gr...@wonderly.org> wrote: > > > >> Well, perhaps some package private extensions could be put in place > which > >> could have "protected" access proxy methods which could allow you to get > >> access? I've always wanted to more formally and fully instrument > discovery > >> in particular. I seem to always end up patching in lots of > new/different > >> debugging each time I end up with some odd network situation at my > >> customers' sites. It seems that there are almost always some firewall > >> issues or something. I'd like to see a serviceUI on reggie which would > >> allow you to see all the registered notification listeners as well as > the > >> connections for each as well as failing notifications due to socket > connect > >> errors and what the related errors are for example. > >> > >> Gregg Wonderly > >> > >> On Oct 28, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl> wrote: > >> > >>> On 27-10-12 19:08, Gregg Wonderly wrote: > >>>> What is your motivation to ask this question? > >>>> > >>>> Gregg > >>>> > >>>> On Oct 24, 2012, at 7:08 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Does anybody have a problem with making com.sun.jini.reggie.Registrar > >> public? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I wanted to build a monitor/prototype for some experimentation, around > >> Registrar.notify(), and noticed i couldnt because of the package private > >> access. > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
