On Apr 2, 2013, at 750AM, Peter Firmstone wrote: > On 2/04/2013 7:51 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote: >> On Apr 2, 2013, at 338AM, Peter Firmstone wrote: >> >>> The formatting didn't work out, I'll create a Jira issue to discuss. >>> >>> Patricia's done a great job detailing the dependencies and issues with >>> TaskManager's Task implementations. >>> >>> I recall a list discussion from the original Sun developers who had >>> intended to replace TaskManager, the runAfter method has issues. >>> >>> Being so prevalent, it's quite possible that TaskManager is causing issues >>> and it might also explain why as performance improves more issues arise. >>> >>> If a task completes before another task which it's supposed to runAfter but >>> isn't present in the queue; that could explain some issues. >>> >>> I much prefer idempotent code myself. >>> >>> This could take some effort to fix, any volunteers? >>> >>> Dennis are you able to continue with your 2.2.1 branch release? >> At this point I am unsure what branch to base the 2.2.1 release off of. > > The 2.2.0 release, it might benefit from backports of synchronization fixes > that improve correctness, but not performance, if some volunteers can diff > the qa-refactoring branch and the 2.2.0 branch, there are numerous simple > synchronization fixes.
I'd like to suggest we release from qa-trunk. With all the work thats been going on here, I dont see back porting it to the 2.2 branch is meaningful. The delta is just too much.
