I'm not aware of anyone using it at present, I certainly don't need it myself, although it is useful for flushing out race conditions, where other processors may require heavier loads before a bug becomes apparent.
Every time I think I've got the bugs sorted on the arm platform (I've seen them manifest on Windows too), they come back when something unrelated is fixed, they appear to be sensitive to timing. These bugs require a superhero / genius dev. I'm finding this a frustrating long drawn out exercise. Regards, Peter. ----- Original message ----- > Hi Peter, > > I'm curious as to why we need the ARM platform? > > Thanks > > Dennis > > On Jun 11, 2013, at 814AM, Peter wrote: > > > Could really use some help here, > > > > There are currently a total of 5 failing tests, 2 on the arm platform, 3 on > > windows 2008 server 64 bit JDK7 > > > > I don't have direct access to the platforms these tests are failing on, if > > someone does and they have some time to help out, please do, lets get River > > rock solid, reliable, predictable and ready for release. > > > > Regards, > > > > Peter. > > > > ----- Original message ----- > > > I was hoping to announce the qa tests were sorted, having just fixed > > > outrigger (please peer review outrigger changes in skunk/qa-refactor), > > > however an issue with Reggie has decided to rear its head. > > > > > > Reggie uses complex data structures and synchronises access using > > > ReadersWriter. > > > > > > Any help will of course be appreciated. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Peter. > > >
