Do you happen to recall who provided it? Was it in a JIRA issue? Cheers,
Greg. On Nov 10, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Jonathan Costers <jonathan.cost...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Greg, this file wasn't contributed by myself (I just committed it as part > of a patch to remove dependency on Sun internal APIs), so I can't really > comment on the intent of this other license header. > > Op 10-nov.-2013, om 21:22 heeft Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> het > volgende geschreven: > >> (This may be a duplicate - I sent once from an email that wasn’t subscribed >> to dev@r.a.o). >> >> Hi all - In particular Jonathan Costers: >> >> I’m in process of rolling a release candidate for 2.2.2 (out of the 2.2 >> branch), and I’ve noticed that we’re missing AL2.0 headers on a few files. >> Most of them are simply manifest files that were in the original >> contribution from Sun, so I’m OK with just adding the AL2.0 header. However >> one of them has an Inria copyright on it. >> >> com.sun.jini.tool.classdepend.AbstractDependencyVisitor.java was added by >> jcosters on 4/17/2009 and subsequently edited by peter_firmstone on >> 9/25/2009. >> >> I suspect that you started from a shell that was in the asm.jar examples >> (because why would asm use the file name ‘AbstractDependencyVisitor’?), and >> that leaving the INRIA header on it was a mistake, so we really ought to >> just change it to AL2.0. Jonathan, could you confirm that? >> >> BTW, the INRIA license is AL2.0-compatible, so leaving the header there >> would be OK, but it just seems out-of-place. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Greg Trasuk. >> >
