Looks like my mobile mail client deleted the wrong paragraph, my reply was intended for Greg's belief we needn't concern ourselves with bugs and refactoring is navel gazing, it was so silly I found myself laughing and probably didn't notice the wrong paragraph was quoted.
I mean, if I didn't find it funny, I probably would have been offended given that he thinks so little of my efforts. Never mind, he won't think so poorly of it after its release. Peter. ----- Original message ----- > On 12/19/2013 10:47 PM, Peter wrote: > > ----- Original message ----- > > > On 12/19/2013 12:16 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote: > > <SNIP> > > > And, using, for example, the strategy you describe of constructing > > > another object, code can be perfectly valid without using Startable. > > > I see value in offering the interface, and a rule that the start > > > method will be called after the constructor for any service > > > implementing it. I don't think River should assume code is not safe > > > just because it does not use that feature - it may be safe for > > > entirely different reasons. > > > > > I think the quoting got messed up here. The quoted paragraph is material > I wrote in reply to one of of Greg's messages. > > Patricia >
