On Jan 20, 2014, at 3:00 AM, Peter Firmstone <j...@zeus.net.au> wrote:
> Greg, > > We need to define the terms of reference for our discussion of proposed > changes. We need to avoid emotive arguments, like “complete red herring”, > “cascade of further failures” and “sweeping changes”. I believe a much > greater risk is not fixing issues, I believe I can demonstrate that, given > the opportunity. I also encourage all who are interested to become involved. > > Which is why I’m asking you to vote on theory driven development: I will abstain from this vote. Cheers, Greg.
