Well these things are well and good, and yes we have the skunk area
where we can all do our individual things, but we can't develop in trunk
either, due to sensitivity.
We need somewhere we can colloborate on ideas, somewhere developers are
free to work together, where no idea is rejected before it can be
demonstrated, at the moment very few ideas are "good enough" and we're
stuck with a very outdated codebase. We need to have something for the
future, or there simply won't be one.
Just my 20 cents.
On 18/02/2014 12:01 AM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Hi Simon:
What are your thoughts on the Phoenix service and activation system?
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk
On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG<si...@qcg.nl> wrote:
On 17-02-14 13:06, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 15-02-14 19:45, Greg Trasuk wrote:
I wonder if we can just discuss the idea of removing activation and
JRMP support from trunk?
For me, JRMP is a no-brainer - the functionality is much better
covered by JERI. I think JRMP was only there for backwards
compatibility to Jini 1.2 services.
+1
Sorry. too quick. +1 on removing JRMP.
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
