Serialized objects are given access to streams, you want to send in a patch?
Do you think that Distributed object's should also be given access to the
OutputStream too?
Regards,
Peter.
----- Original message -----
> How about introducing a builder API:
>
> public My getInstance(Arg1 arg1, ObjectInputStream ois, Arg2 arg2) {...}
>
> public SerialReflectionFactory substitute() {
> return SerialReflectionFactory.builder()
> .factory(My.class)
> .method("getInstance", ARG_TYPES)
> .param(p1)
> .streamParam()
> .param(p2)
> .build();
> }
>
> where "streamParam()" would indicate a placeholder for the actual input
> stream.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> On Monday, March 10, 2014 10:48:29 AM Peter wrote:
> > I'm open to suggestion.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Peter.
> >
> > ----- Original message -----
> >
> > > Peter,
> > >
> > > Can your SerialReflectionFactory expose an API to interact with the
> > > stream? It would be enough to be able to retrieve context
> > > Collection from ObjectStreamContext.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > <Attachment> Michał Kłeczek (XPro).vcf
>
> --
> Michał Kłeczek
> XPro Sp. z o. o.
> ul. Borowskiego 2
> 03-475 Warszawa
> Polska
<Attachment> Michał Kłeczek (XPro).vcf
