+1 Peter.

----- Original message -----
> I don't see why it would need a vote.
> 
> It sounds like a good plan to me.
> 
> +1 (just in case)
> On 20 Nov 2014 16:06, "Greg Trasuk" <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Actually, I had a better idea.
> > 
> > How about if I pull out the ‘tools’ package to a separate Maven project
> > and integrate the changes that Peter did on qa_refactor?   Then both
> > the 2.2 branch and qa_refactor can use the same tools.
> > 
> > Process would be as follows:
> > 
> > - Create a project in Apache git repo for ‘river-tools’
> > - Create a Maven project (I’ll have a look at the modularization that
> > Dennis did, I suspect this is already done) in that repository
> > - Integrate Peter’s updates from qa-refactor (which update to use
> > asm-5 in classdep)
> > - Do a release on river-tools, so that tools.jar can go into Maven
> > Central - Remove tools packages from 2.2. branch.   Modify build to get
> > tools.jar from Central rather than building it.
> > - I can update qa_refactor at the same time.
> > - Roll a release of the 2.2. branch.
> > 
> > Which will leave a 2.2. release that builds under JDK1.8, qa_refactor
> > that uses the same tool, and one less piece of build system confusion
> > to put off new committers.
> > 
> > Opinions?   Does this need a vote?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Greg Trasuk.
> > 
> > On Nov 19, 2014, at 3:19 PM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all:
> > > 
> > > I’m working on getting the build system, particularly
> > > ‘classdepandjar’
> > to work under JDK8.   While I’m in there, I’m wondering if I should
> > rename the affected package, ‘com.sun.jini.tool’, to
> > ‘org.apache.river.tool’ or some such thing.
> > > 
> > > Any opinions?   I would have to change the reference to
> > > classdepandjar in
> > the build scripts, but obviously it would also affect any external
> > build scripts that use it.   I suppose I could leave a wrapper class in
> > ‘com.sun.jini.tool’ so as not to affect build scripts.
> > > 
> > > Opinions?
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > Greg Trasuk
> > > 
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to