No problem since keeping net.jini was a deliberate decision.
On 6/1/2015 4:52 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
On 6/1/2015 4:33 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
Patricia,
I just did a clean checkout of the qa-refactor-namespace branch, and I do
not see any references of old package names in package
org.apache.river.example.hello.I'm looking for com.sun.jini, perhaps I'm
missing something.
I was also looking for "net.jini". We did get the domain name and transfer
it to Apache some years ago, so there is a case for keeping it. However, I
don't know whether Apache is maintaining, and will continue to maintain,
the registration, and this seems like a good time to put everything
possible in the org.apache.river space.
We actually do not want to do that. The net.jini namespace remains intact,
the com.sun.jini name space gets moved over to org.apache.river
Regards
Dennis
