> On Sep 22, 2015, at 1023AM, Greg Trasuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > For now, the current “jtsk/trunk” is an unknown factor as much as > “jtsk/skunk/qa-refactor-namespace/trunk”. I’d suggest renaming “jtsk/trunk” > to “jtsk/abandoned” or something, then rename > “jtsk/skunk/qa-refactor-namespace/trunk” to “jtsk/trunk” and release from > there. That’s the path of least bikeshedding. >
In agreement with you Greg. I’m all for moving to Git, and as you point out there are questions involved with doing that. Lets not get distracted (love the bikeshedding comment!). FWIW, we could also just create river/trunk (as opposed to jtsk/trunk) and move jtsk/skunk/qa-refactor-namespace/trunk there. Regards Dennis
