I know, but (a) there wasn’t an ‘install’ option in the 2.2 branch and (b) it 
seemed wasteful to have all the artifacts listed in two places, both in 
deploy_river and install_river, when the only difference between the two 
scripts is the Maven command.

I didn’t want to delete install_river.groovy, because I knew you had added it 
recently.  Your choice whether to keep it or not.

Cheers,

Greg Trasuk.

> On Jan 13, 2016, at 7:50 AM, Dennis Reedy <dennis.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> You do release that there is already an install_river.groovy script for 
> installing maven artifacts into your local repository?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Dennis
> 
>> On Jan 13, 2016, at 135AM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> OK, I updated both the 2.2 branch and trunk to include a slightly 
>> better-written ‘deploy_groovy.sh’ script, as in the commit message.
>> 
>> Now if you’d like to try building against the Maven artifacts locally, you 
>> can do ‘ant build.all’ from the main folder, then go into ‘poms’ and run 
>> ‘groovy deploy_river.sh -install’, which will install to your local Maven 
>> repository.  If you leave off ‘-install’ the script will prompt you for your 
>> gpg passphrase and deploy to the Apache staging repository.
>> 
>> With either option, you can add the ‘-dryrun’ option to see what commands 
>> will be executed, without actually running the commands.
>> 
>> The script no longer has a version number in it.  It wasn’t actually used, 
>> since the versions are in the pom files.  So in future, we only need to rev 
>> the version numbers in the pom files.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Greg Trasuk
>>> On Jan 12, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Dennis Reedy <dennis.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 12, 2016, at 745AM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote
>>>> 
>>>> Don’t look at me - I’ve never touched the one in ‘trunk’.  In any case, 
>>>> I’ll take a look at it later today - Probably just copy the one over from 
>>>> 2.2 and change the version.
>>> 
>>> Awesome, thanks Greg.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to