I'll reply to these later, I'm on the road atm. In the mean time, what do you, our community of developers envision for River's future?
Regards, Peter. Sent from my Samsung device. Include original message ---- Original message ---- From: Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> Sent: 26/02/2016 01:01:14 am To: dev@river.apache.org Subject: Re: The future thing I think it’s difficult to talk about future features without context. So it would be helpful if we could express in a great level of detail what exactly we see people doing with River. Perhaps even build a proof-of-concept demonstration and use that to drive any changes to River. Cheers, Greg Trasuk > On Feb 25, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: > > Thanks for getting this started. > > I think you have a high level vision of where you see River going in the >future. It might be useful to state it here. The costs and benefits of changes >are best evaluated in that sort of context. > > On 2/25/2016 3:52 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote: >> While we're waiting for people to review River 3.0's Release >> artifacts... >> >> I've posted some of my more contraversial work on River security and >> ipv6 global discovery (internet announcement protocol) on github. >> The river community is free to cherry pick the code if it wants. I >> would have much preferred to have developed it collaboratively, >> there's room for improvement. >> >> Features: > ...
