+1 what Bryan said, with one exception; s/IoT/Service Discovery/
But we all have our own itches to scratch and a more modular project setup would help everyone. Tom > On 16 Apr 2016, at 11:35, Bryan Thompson <br...@blazegraph.com> wrote: > > I would like to see the 3.0 release go forward followed by something like > 2. Breaking down the project into a more modular form and focusing on > updated use cases, especially IoT. > Bryan > > On Saturday, April 16, 2016, Peter <j...@zeus.net.au> wrote: > >> What do you want for River? >> >> 1. Care & Maintenance of 2.2 branch, until retirement? >> 2. Attempt to reinvigorate the project with something new? Eg: minimalist >> modular project, not necessarily backward compatible. + care & >> maintenance of 2.2 branch? >> 3. Attic? >> 4. Attempt to continue project using 2.2 branch only? >> 5. Something else? >> >> If River is to continue, we need at least 3 active pmc members. >> >> Regards, >> >> Peter. >> >> Sent from my Samsung device. >> >>
