It’s a bit difficult to see how/why a read only Git mirror would be useful to us.
I suppose it might encourage (or at least, not discourage) adoption by others. Some River committer will still have to officially drag the Git branches into SVN though. > On 3 May 2016, at 12:48, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: > > Currently, I believe only read-only Git mirrors are supported for most > projects. See http://www.apache.org/dev/git.html. It looks as though the > process for adding a mirror is fairly simple. Would that level of support be > useful? > > There is an experiment going on to extend Git use. I suggest at least one of > you should subscribe to the infrastructure-dev@ list to follow what is > happening. > > On 5/3/2016 4:22 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote: >>> Could we consider a service registrar that doesn't require code downloads? >>> Other language support? What might it look like? >> >> This is my particular itch right now. I’m happy to work on pulling reggie >> out as one of the first modules. >> >> And +1 for git. >> >> >>> On 3 May 2016, at 11:29, Peter <j...@zeus.net.au> wrote: >>> >>> Could we consider a service registrar that doesn't require code downloads? >>> Other language support? What might it look like? >> >>
