Welcome aboard!

I've been wanting to test Sorcer against JGDMS to see if any compatiblity issues pop up too.

Regards,

Peter.

On 27/06/2017 4:30 AM, Michael Sobolewski wrote:
Hi Peter,

I would recommend it strongly and would like to contribute to the project under 
Gradle.
With Gradle automation it will have the great impact on future development with 
many
new potential contributors that already use Gradle for large scale projects 
based on Jini.

Regards,
Mike

On Jun 26, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Dennis Reedy<dennis.re...@gmail.com>  wrote:

Hi Peter,

Congrats on all the work you've put into this project. Modularizing the project 
is a big step forward. As you know I've been using Maven for my projects, but 
lately I've found that Gradle provides a much more powerful, straight forward 
and flexible approach for project automation, especially for multi-module 
projects.

You can take a look at what a Gradle project would look like with River here 
(https://github.com/dreedyman/apache-river-example). If you'd like I could work 
with you and see what a Gradle version of JGDMS would look like, IMO it will 
simplify the project greatly.

HTH

Regards

Dennis

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 23, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Peter<j...@zeus.net.au>  wrote:

This is what a Maven Build looks like:

https://travis-ci.org/pfirmstone/JGDMS/builds/246158857?utm_source=email&utm_medium=notification

All modules are also OSGi bundles, no split packages, no circular dependencies.

Yeah even phoenix is still there, no longer dependant on the Sun JVM 
implementation, can run on any JVM now and uses JERI Endpoints by default.

The only remaining component that is Sun JVM implementation dependant is the 
JERI Kerberos provider.

There's even a compatibility library for Jini 2.1, so people can upgrade and 
migrate their code on their time schedule.

All the old ways of using Jini are still supported, such as classdepandjar, 
preferred classloading, but now Maven and OSGi are much better supported too.

Oh yeah, security has been addressed, deserialization with input validation, 
the latest TLSv1.2 cyphers, IPv6 Global discovery announcement etc.

Oh and anyone can build it now, with a simple one line argument.  The build 
also includes CVE security checks.

These are the features that were so hard to get acceptance for, but as it turns 
out, you don't need to break backward compatibility in order to achieve it.

This is how I'd like River to be, of course if the community wants something 
else, then I'll support whatever the community decides.

Regards,

Peter.


Reply via email to