Will-JZH opened a new issue #21:  What is the difference between brokerName and 
brokerClusterName
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-operator/issues/21
 
 
   The issue tracker is **ONLY** used for the bug report(feature request need 
to follow [RIP 
process](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RocketMQ-Improvement-Proposal)).
 Keep in mind, please check whether there is an existing same report before you 
raise a new one.
   
   Alternately (especially if your communication is not a bug report), you can 
send mail to our [mailing lists](http://rocketmq.apache.org/about/contact/). We 
welcome any friendly suggestions, bug fixes, collaboration and other 
improvements.
   
   Please ensure that your bug report is clear and that it is complete. 
Otherwise, we may be unable to understand it or to reproduce it, either of 
which would prevent us from fixing the bug. We strongly recommend the 
report(bug report or feature request) could include some hints as the following:
   
   **BUG REPORT**
   
   1. Please describe the issue you observed:
   
   - What did you do (The steps to reproduce)?
   
   Why does brokerClusterName need to be suffixed with "brokerGroupIndex"? As I 
understand it, one cluster contains multiple brokers
   
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25976014/75410710-bad88400-5957-11ea-9f7e-0c3241a621cb.png)
   
   - What did you expect to see?
   brokerClusterName removes the brokerGroupIndex suffix
   
   - What did you see instead?
   brokerClusterName is suffixed with "brokerGroupIndex"
   
   2. Please tell us about your environment:
   operator:0.2.0
   
   3. Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, logs, related issues, 
suggestions how to fix, etc):
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to