+1
I checked
- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
- License and Notice are correct in source package.
- All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
- No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
- Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> 在 2020年3月31日，下午9:35，ShannonDing <[email protected]> 写道：
>
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>
> This is the vote for version 2.0.0 of Apache RocketMQ Client Go Native.
> For the first product ready RocketMQ Client in pure go, it supports almost
> the full features of Apache RocketMQ, such as pub and sub messages, ACL,
> message tracing and so on.
> The artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-go/2.0.0-rc3/
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/releases/tag/v2.0.0
> Hash for the release tag:
> be579956f83854915f9742578e8db81860b71112
> Release Notes:
> http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-go-2.0.0/
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> BC9E172DE1BA5B24EBB4A628177B55985D75751B, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>
> Checklist for reference,
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> Fill in the following:
> [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [ ] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> [ ] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> [ ] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> As we don’t release binary package for Apache RocketMQ Go SDK, the binary
> package checklist should not be followed.
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this
> email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> Please vote accordingly:
>
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>
>
>
>
