+1

At 2021-03-22 14:00:37, "Rongtong Jin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>+1, I checked
>
>[ ok]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
>
>[ ok] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>
>[ ok] License and Notice are correct in the source package.
>
>[ ok]  All files have license headers in the source package if necessary.
>
>&quot;heng du&quot; &lt;[email protected]&gt;写道:
>> +1
>> 
>> [ ok]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
>> 
>> [ ok] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>> 
>> [ ok] License and Notice are correct in the source package.
>> 
>> [ ok]  All files have license headers in the source package if necessary.
>> 
>> [ ok]   No compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
>> 
>> [ ok] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
>> 
>> 胡 宗棠 <[email protected]> 于2021年3月19日周五 上午10:31写道:
>> 
>> > +1
>> > checked
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > 发件人: zhang xu <[email protected]>
>> > 发送时间: 2021年3月18日 22:10
>> > 收件人: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> > 主题: Re: [VOTE]Release Apache RocketMQ Client Go Native 2.1.0.
>> >
>> > +1
>> > checked
>> >
>> > [ OK ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>> > release.
>> >
>> > [ OK ]  License and Notice are correct in the source package.
>> >
>> > [ OK ]  All files have license headers in the source package if necessary.
>> >
>> > [ OK ]  No compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
>> >
>> > [ OK ]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
>> >
>> > ShannonDing <[email protected]> 于2021年3月18日周四 下午9:09写道:
>> >
>> > > Hello RocketMQ Community,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > This is the vote for version 2.1.0 of Apache RocketMQ Client Go Native.
>> > >
>> > > The main goal of this release is to improve stability, usability, and fix
>> > > bugs and the source code of this release is the copy of the master which
>> > > has merged from the native branch before.
>> > >
>> > > The artifacts:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-go/2.1.0-rc6/
>> > >
>> > > Git tag for the release:
>> > >
>> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/releases/tag/v2.1.0
>> > >
>> > > The hash for the release tag:
>> > >
>> > > d6e66a2d648d6529eca833f9bf912915d1749a5c
>> > >
>> > > Release Notes:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-go-2.1.0/
>> > >
>> > > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>> > >
>> > > BC9E172DE1BA5B24EBB4A628177B55985D75751B, which can be found in the keys
>> > > file:
>> > >
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Checklist for reference,
>> > >
>> > > Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking
>> > > releases.
>> > >
>> > > Fill in the following:
>> > >
>> > > [ ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
>> > >
>> > > [ ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>> > release.
>> > >
>> > > [ ]  License and Notice are correct in the source package.
>> > >
>> > > [ ]  All files have license headers in the source package if necessary.
>> > >
>> > > [ ]  No compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
>> > >
>> > > [ ]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
>> > >
>> > > As we don’t release binary packages for Apache RocketMQ Go SDK, the
>> > binary
>> > > package checklist should not be followed.
>> > >
>> > > And any other checkpoint is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
>> > this
>> > > email, we sincerely hope for your feedback.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
>> > > of votes are reached.
>> > >
>> > > Please vote accordingly:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > >
>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > The Apache RocketMQ Team
>> >

Reply via email to