Pirate-Captain opened a new issue #3178: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/3178
The issue tracker is **ONLY** used for bug report(feature request need to follow [RIP process](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RocketMQ-Improvement-Proposal)). Keep in mind, please check whether there is an existing same report before your raise a new one. Alternately (especially if your communication is not a bug report), you can send mail to our [mailing lists](http://rocketmq.apache.org/about/contact/). We welcome any friendly suggestions, bug fixes, collaboration and other improvements. Please ensure that your bug report is clear and that it is complete. Otherwise, we may be unable to understand it or to reproduce it, either of which would prevent us from fixing the bug. We strongly recommend the report(bug report or feature request) could include some hints as the following: **BUG REPORT** 1. Please describe the issue you observed: - What did you do (The steps to reproduce)? - What did you expect to see? - What did you see instead? 2. Please tell us about your environment: 3. Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, logs, related issues, suggestions how to fix, etc): **FEATURE REQUEST** 1. Please describe the feature you are requesting. 2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature. 2. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue? 4. If there are some sub-tasks using -[] for each subtask and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub task: - [sub-task1-issue-number](example_sub_issue1_link_here): sub-task1 description here, - [sub-task2-issue-number](example_sub_issue2_link_here): sub-task2 description here, - ... If there has multi producer and consumer in the same service, every producer or consumer has different acl accesskey，and d different accesskey has different perms，and there is only one MQClientInstance as the clientid is the same one(i change the instanceName to pid)，then when request thre broker, all the acl accesskey in the request header is same, so should the acl used in client need be improved? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
