+1,

 checked:
[ok] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[ok] License and Notice are correct in the source package.
[ok] All files have license headers in the source package if necessary.
[ok] No compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
[ok] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.

At 2021-09-04 10:46:56, "Rongtong Jin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>+1, I checked
>1.Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>2.Git tag page has correct release version for rocketmq version
>3.Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
>4.Source code can built and compile successfully.
>
>
>&quot;倪泽&quot; &lt;[email protected]&gt;写道:
>> +1
>> [ok] check artifacts has correct names and release version.
>> [ok] Git tag page has correct release version for rocketmq version, and
>> source code zip package.
>> [ok] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
>> [ok]All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>> [ok] source code can built and compile successfully.
>> 
>> heng du <[email protected]> 于2021年9月3日周五 下午12:28写道:
>> 
>> > +1
>> >
>> > checked:
>> >
>> > [[ok] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>> > release.
>> > [ok] License and Notice are correct in the source package.
>> > [ok] All files have license headers in the source package if necessary.
>> > [ok] No compiled archives bundled in the source archive.
>> > [ok] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
>> > [ok] The code can be built success in the source package.
>> >
>> > jinrongtong <[email protected]> 于2021年8月31日周二 下午6:57写道:
>> >
>> > > Hello RocketMQ Community,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > This is the vote for the 2.2.1 release of Apache RocketMQ-Spring.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The artifacts:
>> > >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-spring/2.2.1-rc1/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The staging repo:
>> > >
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1060
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Git tag for the release:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/releases/tag/rocketmq-spring-all-2.2.1
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Hash for the release tag:
>> > > 7fbcc85e1161154a60a94e1b0e654c19443bf160
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Release Notes:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-spring-2.2.1/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>> > > EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys
>> > > file:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Checklist for reference,
>> > > Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking
>> > > releases.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Fill in the following:
>> > > [ ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package.
>> > > [ ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>> > release.
>> > > [ ]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
>> > > [ ]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>> > > [ ]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>> > > [ ]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
>> > > [ ]  The code can be built success in the source package.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > And any other checkpoint is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
>> > this
>> > > email, we sincerely hope for your feedback.
>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number
>> > of
>> > > votes are reached.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Please vote accordingly:
>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > The Apache RocketMQ Team
>> >

Reply via email to