Erik1288 opened a new issue #3849:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/3849


   The issue tracker is **ONLY** used for bug report(feature request need to 
follow [RIP 
process](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RocketMQ-Improvement-Proposal)).
 Keep in mind, please check whether there is an existing same report before 
your raise a new one.
   
   Alternately (especially if your communication is not a bug report), you can 
send mail to our [mailing lists](http://rocketmq.apache.org/about/contact/). We 
welcome any friendly suggestions, bug fixes, collaboration and other 
improvements.
   
   Please ensure that your bug report is clear and that it is complete. 
Otherwise, we may be unable to understand it or to reproduce it, either of 
which would prevent us from fixing the bug. We strongly recommend the 
report(bug report or feature request) could include some hints as the following:
   
   **FEATURE REQUEST**
   
   1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.
   
   Configurable queue lock type and size for better performance tuning.
   
   2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
   
   1). Add two config items in MessageStoreConfig.
   2). Construct QueueLock with these two newly added config items.
   
   3. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, 
should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address 
this issue?
   Nice-to-have.
   
   4. If there are some sub-tasks using -[] for each subtask and create a 
corresponding issue to map to the sub task:
   
   - [sub-task1-issue-number](example_sub_issue1_link_here): sub-task1 
description here, 
   - [sub-task2-issue-number](example_sub_issue2_link_here): sub-task2 
description here,
   - ...
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to