+1 



[OK ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package.
[OK ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK ]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
[OK ]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[OK ]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.


[OK ]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
[OK ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK ] Build the source, start nameserver and broker according to the 
quick-start.
At 2022-02-25 14:53:01, "caigy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>+1 
>I checked:
>[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[OK]  Build the source, start nameserver and broker according to the 
>quick-start.
>[OK]  Run cluster list command to see if the version is correct
>
>
>
>在 2022-02-25 14:27:56,"Amber Liu" <[email protected]> 写道:
>>+1
>>checked:
>>[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>>[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>>[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>>[OK]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start.
>>
>>nize <[email protected]> 于2022年2月24日周四 11:05写道:
>>
>>> +1
>>> checked:
>>> [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>>> [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>>> [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
>>> [OK] All UT can pass
>>> [OK] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>>>
>>>
>>> heng du <[email protected]> 于2022年2月24日周四 09:59写道:
>>>
>>> > +1
>>> > I checked:
>>> > [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>>> > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>>> > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>>> > [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>>> > release.
>>> > [OK] All UT can pass
>>> > [OK] Run cluster list command to see if the version is correct
>>> > [OK] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Rongtong Jin <[email protected]> 于2022年2月23日周三 20:36写道:
>>> >
>>> > > +1
>>> > > I Checked
>>> > >
>>> > > [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>>> > > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>>> > > [OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>>> > > [OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>>> > > release.
>>> > > [OK] All UT can pass
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > 2022-02-23 15:02:22"tiger lee" <[email protected]>写道:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hello RocketMQ Community,
>>> > >
>>> > > This is the vote for 4.9.3 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>>> > > This release is to improve some features and issues for apache
>>> > > rocketmq,such as support for Multiple Directories Storage, improve
>>> > > performances, fix some bugs and issues and so on.
>>> > >
>>> > > The artifacts:
>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.3-rc1/
>>> > >
>>> > > The staging repo:
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1081
>>> > >
>>> > > Git tag for the release:
>>> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/releases/tag/rocketmq-all-4.9.3
>>> > >
>>> > > Hash for the release tag:
>>> > > c7989f85744e65e24b43955c88987288487b4707
>>> > >
>>> > > Release Notes:
>>> > > https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.9.3
>>> > >
>>> > > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>>> > > F32A2D46, which can be found in the keys file:
>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
>>> number
>>> > > of votes are reached.
>>> > > Please vote accordingly:
>>> > >
>>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > The Apache RocketMQ Team
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>

Reply via email to