iamqq23ue commented on issue #5128: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/5128#issuecomment-1253403694
> Hi @iamqq23ue @azhsmesos, I listed some related documents[1][2][3], similar features have been merged into develop branch, and the first version of RocketMQ 5.0 will be released soon. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/blob/develop/docs/cn/controller/deploy.md [2] https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-44-Support-DLedger-Controller [3] https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-34-Support-quorum-write-and-adaptive-degradation-in-master-slave-architecture It looks very functional, thanks.But IMO，I noticed that the following quote maybe wrong . In my test, even if SYNC_MASTER is set, two slaves still only need one slave to return ACK and the other to be asynchronous.version 4.9.1. In addition, is RIP-34 still unable to set which slave is synchronous and which is asynchronous? quote: "However, synchronous replication returns only after each copy is confirmed. On the other hand, in synchronous replication mode, if a slave in the group feigned death, the whole transmission would fail until manual processing." -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
