+1 -
I have checked the following contents and they are all passed [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. [] The code can be built success in the source package. [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct aaron ai <aaro...@apache.org> 于2023年3月28日周二 14:21写道： > +1 > > 奥利弗 <wqdyx...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月28日周二 10:48写道： > > > +1 > > > > 1. asc, sha512 exists and checked. > > 2. LICENSE and NOTICE exist. > > 3. Build the package from source success. > > 4. Tags are correct. > > > > By the way, validation is easier if the sha512 file is in this format > > > 5bfe9cdb4513faeb42a07a36da8c5f62b0d200dd1d636c2647e328dab0fb9b5c94dcdb3343b1f1111f3b9faf6cf7d69321e1279356c9658678a97c3d43a23616 > > rocketmq-all-4.9.5-bin-release.zip > > > > > 2023年3月27日 21:33，fuyou <fuyou...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > jinrongtong <jinrongt...@apache.org>于2023年3月27日 周一18:51写道： > > > > > >> Hello RocketMQ Community, > > >> > > >> This is the vote for 4.9.5 of Apache RocketMQ. > > >> > > >> This release fixes some bugs and supports bname in protocol for 4.9.5 > > >> client accessing proxy. > > >> > > >> The artifacts: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.5-rc1/ > > >> > > >> The staging repo: > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1172 > > >> > > >> Git tag for the release: > > >> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-4.9.5 > > >> > > >> Hash for the release tag: > > >> 66b7e6f5f1d383a68082a2d5a9609f5165532841 > > >> > > >> Release Notes: > > >> https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/03/26/4.9.5/ > > >> > > >> > > >> The artifacts have been signed with Key : > > >> EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the > keys > > >> file: > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > >> > > >> Checklist for reference, > > >> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking > > releases. > > >> Fill in the following: > > >> > > >> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > >> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > >> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > > release. > > >> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > >> [] License and Notice are correct in source package. > > >> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > > >> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > > >> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > >> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > >> [] The code can be built success in the source package. > > >> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start > > >> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct > > >> > > >> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to > > >> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > >> > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number > of > > >> votes are reached. > > >> > > >> Please vote accordingly: > > >> > > >> [ ] +1 approve > > >> > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >> > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> The Apache RocketMQ Team > > >> > > > -- > > > ============================================= > > > > > > fuyou001 > > > Best Regards > > > > >
