Hi Ding, Thank you for your reply! Looking forward to your pr~
Best wished, > 2023年11月17日 11:37，丁双喜 <dingshuangxi...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Hello qiaoao > > NameServer is unable to directly support ACL for the following two reasons: > > 1. NameServer is a stateless application, and storing ACL configurations > is not suitable. > 2. ACL is stored on the Broker, so if NameServer wants to support ACL, > it would require a reverse dependency on the Broker, which is also not > suitable. > > The current solution available is: In RocketMQ 5.0, a Proxy component was > introduced. This component acts as a proxy for both NameServer and Broker > access, allowing NameServer to not be exposed externally. > > > Best Regards > > qiaoao <qiao...@foxmail.com> 于2023年11月15日周三 20:32写道： > >> Good to know! Will the ACL 2.0 support ACL in NameServer? >> >>> 2023年11月15日 19:50，丁双喜 <dingshuangxi...@gmail.com> 写道： >>> >>> Hi, RocketMQ Community >>> >>> RocketMQ ACL is crucial for ensuring the security of message data. We aim >>> to enhance its capabilities and are preparing to upgrade it to a newer >>> version. >>> >>> We have written the proposal and you can see it by the link below: >>> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/7560 >>> >>> Please reply to this email if you have any questions >>> Best Regards >> >>
