+1(Non-binding). I checked:

[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package.
[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[OK]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
[OK]  The code can be built success in the source package.






At 2024-09-27 11:07:29, "ShannonDing" <ding...@apache.org> wrote:
>+1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 2024-09-19 20:57:35, "jinrongtong" <jinrongt...@apache.org> wrote:
>>Hello RocketMQ Community,
>>
>>This is the vote for the 2.0.0 release of Apache RocketMQ Dashboard.
>>
>>The artifacts:
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-dashboard/2.0.0-rc1/
>>
>>
>>The staging repo:
>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1332
>>
>>
>>Git tag for the release:
>>https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-dashboard/releases/tag/rocketmq-dashboard-2.0.0
>>
>>
>>Hash for the release tag:
>>f5c09ac287249cf2a2a0b0c95d7fbca8d8a59a38
>>
>>
>>Release Notes:
>>https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2024/09/18/release-notes-rocketmq-dashboard-2.0.0
>>
>>
>>The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>>EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys file:
>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>>
>>
>>Checklist for reference,
>>Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking releases.
>>
>>
>>Fill in the following:
>>[ ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package.
>>[ ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>>[ ]  License and Notice are correct in source package.
>>[ ]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>>[ ]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>>[ ]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts.
>>[ ]  The code can be built success in the source package.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>And any other checkpoint is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this 
>>email, we sincerely hope for your feedback.
>>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number of 
>>votes are reached.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Please vote accordingly:
>>[ ] +1 approve 
>>[ ] +0 no opinion 
>>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Rongtong Jin

Reply via email to