Hi,

Thanks for your reminder, we will add project introduction in the future
announce mails.

Thanks.


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:14 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:

> What is the project about?
> Why should I be interested in it?
> [rhetorical questions]
>
> The Announce emails are sent to people not on the developer or user lists.
> Most will have no idea what the project is about.
>
> So the e-mails should contain at least brief details of what the
> product does, and some info on why the new release might be of
> interest to them.
>
> Readers should not have to click the link to find out the basic information
> (although of course it is useful to have such links for further detail).
>
> Please can you add that information to future announce mails?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On 21 February 2017 at 02:10, yukon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache RocketMQ team would like to announce the release of Apache
> > RocketMQ 4.0.0 (incubating).
> >
> > More details regarding Apache RocketMQ can be found at:
> >
> > http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/
> >
> > The release artifacts can be downloaded here:
> >
> > https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi?path=incubator/
> rocketmq/4.0.0-incubating/
> > or
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/
> rocketmq/4.0.0-incubating/
> >
> > The release notes can be found here:
> >
> > http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-4.0.0-
> incubating/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
> > — DISCLAIMER Apache RocketMQ is an effort undergoing incubation at The
> > Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator PMC.
> > Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until a further
> review
> > indicates that the infrastructure, communications, and decision making
> > process have stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF
> > projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the
> > completeness or stability of the code,it does indicate that the project
> has
> > yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.
>

Reply via email to