Cool~ On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:20 AM, zhangke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion that server use JDK7. I forgot JDK6 just for > client. > > About images, two is ok. First is for namesrv,broker and console. > Different command will be used. This image is preparing for deploy them on > seperate physical node. Second image is built by docker-compose to start > the three components by just one command. It's for develop or test > environment mainly to start the whole system more quick and easy. Now i am > not sure if docker officcial accepts compose. > > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ > *发件人:* "yukon" <[email protected]>; > *发送时间:* 2017年3月15日(星期三) 11:07 > *收件人:* "dev" <[email protected]>; > *主题:* Re: [DISCUSS] Details of the feature "Provider a docker image for > RocketMQ" > > > Hi Rick, > > Thanks for your interest in this feature. > > For server, JDK7+ is better, only client supports JDK6. > > About the second and third points, Do you mean provide 4 docker images, > three separate docker images for namesrv/broker/console, while the last is > a all-in-one docker image? > > Regards, > yukon > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Rick Zhang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks, please let me know after you put the original project into new > git > > external repository. > > > > 2017-03-15 9:59 GMT+08:00 Von Gosling <[email protected]>: > > > > > Cool ~ > > > > > > > > > In fact, the docker image has been existence since 3.2.6. But there is > > > some work to be done, hoping to polish it continuously. We can host it > in > > > our new git external repository. > > > > > > > > > > 在 2017年3月14日，22:24，Rick Zhang <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > > > > > 4. After docker file reviewed by RocketMQ Team, it's better to > submit a > > > PR > > > > > > > > > >
