> I also not sure this page has been updated as requested. [5] These companies > “use” Apache RocketMQ, companies are not “involved" in Apache projects > individuals are. >
Sorry to response for this problem, we replace this word with use :-) > IMO the GitHub repo at [2] should be closed down and all code moved to Apache > RocketMQ repository as we now have Apache repo created for externals. [3] > > If it decided to not close it down, at the very least I think the content > there needs to change: > - Github is not the "RocketMQ Community” the RocketMQ community is here at > Apache. > - It's is no clear there is any involvement with an Apache project at there. > - The page needs to respect Apache’s trademarks and follow branding > guidelines. > - the “Rewards” section on [4] is troubling. Commitership / PMC membership > should not be given away based on contributions to external projects and the > PMC needs to follow Apache process and vote committers in. Please clarify and > provide links the to process there. As fo these problems, stevenschew will do this later~ > 在 2017年4月2日，07:19，Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 写道： > > Hi, > > We’ve discussed this before [4] but I can see many links to new external > GitHub repos on this page [1] on the Apache RocketMQ site. What are the > reasons for the new external GitHub repos? > > IMO the GitHub repo at [2] should be closed down and all code moved to Apache > RocketMQ repository as we now have Apache repo created for externals. [3] > > If it decided to not close it down, at the very least I think the content > there needs to change: > - Github is not the "RocketMQ Community” the RocketMQ community is here at > Apache. > - It's is no clear there is any involvement with an Apache project at there. > - The page needs to respect Apache’s trademarks and follow branding > guidelines. > - the “Rewards” section on [4] is troubling. Commitership / PMC membership > should not be given away based on contributions to external projects and the > PMC needs to follow Apache process and vote committers in. Please clarify and > provide links the to process there. > > I also not sure this page has been updated as requested. [5] These companies > “use” Apache RocketMQ, companies are not “involved" in Apache projects > individuals are. > > It would be great if the PMC could look into this and correct where needed. > Any questions please ask. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. > https://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/activity/launch-rocketmq-code-marathon/ > 2. https://github.com/rocketmq > 3. https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals > 4. > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5916360bc602497fd71acd1c5a3f570b8d6c874cd97dcae845c7a38b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E > 5. https://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/customer/
