Re: svn commit: r539786 - /roller/branches/roller_guice/readme-guice.txt

[Anil Gangolli]

I'm really happy that we are playing in this direction, because I think 
adopting the DI model, if we really adopt it fundamentally, will tend to 
improve our modularity and clarify dependencies.

On the choice of Guice, I have concerns.  From my perspective Spring is more 
mature, well-documented and tested,  has a more open contribution model, and 
is in wider use amongst a broader community.  Plus we have at least two 
committers that are using it in other settings.

I understand some of the aversion to the XML configuration.  Still XML can 
be readily manipulated both manually and automatically during installation; 
I hope we won't be asking users to modify distributed code in order, for 
example, to add plugins or to swap a rendering model implementation.

--a.