On Nov 28, 2007 10:24 AM, Thinkboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-11-26 22:44:57 +0800, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Nov 21, 2007 5:47 AM, Thinkboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I am thinking how to set a certain blog as private , then whoever > >> trying to view this entry will be authenticated. > > > > What if weblog posts had the following levels of privacy: > > > > - Private: only members of the blog can see the entry > > - Protected: only logged in Roller users can see the entry > > - Public: everybody (including anonymous visitors) can see the entry > > > > Would that be sufficient? > > yes, this is exactly what I am thinking too (private, protected, > public) . i believe, it is a great feature! > > very appreciated that roller community does consider this in the near > future release. COOL! . :-D
Despite the fact that I just spent a month or more reworking Roller's user/permissions management system (http://tinyurl.com/28br55 is now in trunk), I don't have an immediate requirement for private/protected weblogs or weblog entries and I don't think any of the other contributors do either. I *do* think these are important features, but I just don't have a requirement for them right now. So, if you really want protected/private blog posts, you might have to push pretty hard for it, i.e. look at the source code, understand the permission system, propose & discuss some solution(s) and if that goes well develop a patch. - Dave
