On 3/24/08, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Pavel Konnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:57:50 +0300, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> What is the main criteria for application?
> > >>
> >
> > > You mean the most important requirement for the new feature?
> > > The most important characteristic of the GSoC developer?
> > >
> > Implementation of _all_ features ("page through file uploads", "search",
> > "thumbnail images", "folder creation user interface", "store metadata for
> > each file")
> >
> > or usability of "whole new interface"?
> >
> > "search" feature is very important?
>
> Ease of use is probably the most important requirement. The idea is to
> make significant improvements to the interface to make it easier for
> folks to upload, browse and blog uploaded files. Most users don't have
> that many uploads, so if we have good browse then search is less
> important. Metadata is also less important than ease of use, at least
> in my mind. You'll need to figure out which features are most
> important and we'll help you to do that.
>
> - Dave
>I imagine that a gallery for the uploaded image files should has the following options into the interface: miniatures size: [ small | medium | big ] miniatures per page: [ __ ] < previous page > < next page > go to page: [ select a page nº ] ( show | hide ) filename The image location may be important if the file will be used into the weblog or in an external webpage. Then why not add a text input for each path: [ ../resource/folder_name/image_file.img ] [ http://www.site.moon/weblog_name/resource/folder_name/image_file.img ] so the image location can easily be copied to be used into a weblog entry or into an external webpage.
