On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:52 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: > umm, re 2.2, JavaEE5 <> JPA 1.0, JavaEE6 <> JPA 2.0
Yes. My mistake, I meant to say Java EE 6 app servers not 5. Because Roller v5 uses JPA v2, it is effectively a Java EE 6 application and I'm OK with that (i.e. I'm not about to propose backing off to JPA 1.2). > I guess some JavaEE5 servers now have "previews" of jpa 2? I don't know about that. I did not mean to mention Java EE 5. > I think it would be a good idea to avoid relying on proprietary features of > any particular jpa implementation and get roller working with all the jpa 2 > implementations but I'm not in a position at the moment to contribute any > time for this admirable goal :-\ Yes, I agree with that and I am willing to contribute some (late night hacking) time to that goal. Thanks, - Dave
