Thanks so much for checking out the build. I'll re-roll it today without those rc3-tomcat files.
- Dave On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Anil Gangolli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Dave. The candidate passed the following smoke tests. > > Downloaded all distribution packages. All signatures verified OK. > > Unpacked tomcat tar.gz package. > Deployed on Tomcat 7.0.27, Sun/Oracle Java JDK 1.7.0_04, MySQL 5.5.22, > Ubuntu 12.04 > DB tables created OK. > Created initial user, weblog, front page, and entry without problems. > > I did not test other packages or the source package. > > I did unpack the source tar.gz package and noticed one weirdness with it. I > noticed the source package also contains a directory called rc3-tomcat with > some bundles; this makes it large, and, curiously, these contained bundles > do not seem to binary match the top-level signed distros. This looks like > it may be a minor build bug when assembling the source package. > > --a. > > > > > > On 6/6/2012 9:55 PM, Dave wrote: >> >> Anil found another issue in the Apache Roller 5.0.1 release candidate, >> so I have created a new one. This new candidate changes the "Salt >> values in all HTML forms" fix so that salt values are user-specific. >> >> You can find the new RC3 files here: >> http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-5.0.1-RC3/ >> >> I'll call for a release vote on Monday assuming that no major issues >> have been found. >> >> Thanks, >> - Dave > > > -- Dave M. Johnson Apache Roller PMC Chair http://rollerweblogger.org/roller
