This set of files is exactly the same code as RC3, but without the
extra and unneeded rc3-tomcat directory:

   http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-5.0.1-RC4

I think we are ready for a release vote. I'll call for one on Sunday.

Thanks!
- Dave



On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks so much for checking out the build. I'll re-roll it today
> without those rc3-tomcat files.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Anil Gangolli <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Dave.  The candidate passed the following smoke tests.
>>
>> Downloaded all distribution packages.  All signatures verified OK.
>>
>> Unpacked tomcat tar.gz package.
>> Deployed on Tomcat 7.0.27, Sun/Oracle Java JDK 1.7.0_04, MySQL 5.5.22,
>> Ubuntu 12.04
>> DB tables created OK.
>> Created initial user, weblog, front page, and entry without problems.
>>
>> I did not test other packages or the source package.
>>
>> I did unpack the source tar.gz package and noticed one weirdness with it.  I
>> noticed the source package also contains a directory called rc3-tomcat with
>> some bundles; this makes it large, and, curiously, these contained bundles
>> do not seem to binary match the top-level signed distros.   This looks like
>> it may be a minor build bug when assembling the source package.
>>
>> --a.
>>
>> On 6/6/2012 9:55 PM, Dave wrote:
>>>
>>> Anil found another issue in the Apache Roller 5.0.1 release candidate,
>>> so I have created a new one. This new candidate changes the "Salt
>>> values in all HTML forms" fix so that salt values are user-specific.
>>>
>>> You can find the new RC3 files here:
>>>    http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/apache-roller-5.0.1-RC3/
>>>
>>> I'll call for a release vote on Monday assuming that no major issues
>>> have been found.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> - Dave

Reply via email to