For your below suggestion, I'm not sure how the code can go from an explicit MD5 or SHA encoder to a generic StandardPasswordEncoder() and still work. I think your solution is OK otherwise.

Another solution I'm thinking of is adding a new column "BCPassword" or whatever to the Roller User table with no user option to choose encryption method. Upon login, if and only if BCPassword is null, check vs. the current password column using the old encryption algorithm. The moment a user makes a password change, fill in the BCPassword column and from then on rely on that column alone for authentication. With this method, we can exhort all users to change their password to make sure the BCPassword column is all filled up, so for a future Roller release without the old auth mechanism, it won't matter because everyone will have the BCPassword field filled (if not, then an Admin will have to manually change the user's password for the holdouts.) How does that sound?

But this issue is probably not urgent. Spring will keep this value for probably a few more years, and if not, we can stay on the present Spring security version for quite some time (we're already at the latest and greatest.)

Regards,
Glen

On 01/27/2014 09:00 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
Gen,

PasswordEncoder has been depreciated for some time now, but whether it will
be removed I am unsure.  If passwords have been hashed its never going to
be an easy change as its a one way encryption. The changes if I remember
are mainly in the java classes so we could leave the old code and use
properties to control which one is in use.

ie changes are

from:

DaoAuthenticationProvider provider = (DaoAuthenticationProvider)
ctx.getBean("org.springframework.security.authentication.dao.DaoAuthenticationProvider#0");
             String algorithm =
WebloggerConfig.getProperty("passwds.encryption.algorithm");
             PasswordEncoder encoder = null;
             if (algorithm.equalsIgnoreCase("SHA")) {
                 encoder = new ShaPasswordEncoder();
             } else if (algorithm.equalsIgnoreCase("MD5")) {
                 encoder = new Md5PasswordEncoder();
             } else {
                 log.error("Encryption algorithm '" + algorithm + "' not
supported, disabling encryption.");
             }
             if (encoder != null) {
                 provider.setPasswordEncoder(encoder);
                 log.info("Password Encryption Algorithm set to '" +
algorithm + "'");
             }
......

to:

DaoAuthenticationProvider springProvider = (DaoAuthenticationProvider) ctx

.getBean("org.springframework.security.authentication.dao.DaoAuthenticationProvider#0");
if (springProvider != null) {
                 String theEncoder =
WebloggerConfig.getProperty("passwds.encryption.encoder");
                 if (theEncoder.equalsIgnoreCase("Standard")) {
                     encoder = new StandardPasswordEncoder();
                 } else if (theEncoder.equalsIgnoreCase("BCrypt")) {
                     encoder = new BCryptPasswordEncoder();
                 } else {
                     log.error("Failed to locate encoder using : " +
theEncoder
                             + ", not supported, disabling encryption.");
                 }
                 if (encoder == null) {
                     encoder = NoOpPasswordEncoder.getInstance();
                 }
.......
}

I guess if we have both they will never want to change.

Cheers Greg.


On 27 January 2014 11:52, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

If this configuration is done in XML: http://mprabhat.wordpress.com/
2012/07/20/spring-security-3-1-password-encoder-with-
custom-database-and-jsf-2-0/, it may be sufficient to provide two XML
blocks, one using the deprecated and one using the new, with the deprecated
one commented-out.  Then the install guide would tell people to uncomment
the one and comment the other if they're upgrading from 5.0.x or
earlier....?

Glen

On 01/27/2014 06:44 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:

If we have to, we have to--but how will people be able to upgrade from
5.0.x to 5.1 without everyone's password being lost and hence locked out
(i.e., if blogs.oracle.com tried this all users would be locked out,
right?)  Perhaps we can support both algorithms in 5.1 (
http://stackoverflow.com/a/17450276).

But if we have to break it, let's use moving forward the best algorithm,
from the above link the BCCrypt() one apparently (unless you know
otherwise).  Also, we don't have to use Spring here if plain Java offers
corresponding libraries (less likely to deprecate).

Also, Greg, please answer this question I put in the comments (if you
know it), in case you missed it: https://issues.apache.org/
jira/browse/ROL-1795, we have the closing of a JIRA issue (always a good
thing :) on the line...

Glen

On 01/27/2014 05:23 AM, Greg Huber wrote:

Gentlemen,

The class
org.springframework.security.authentication.encoding.PasswordEncoder SHA
and MD5 in RollerContext has been depreciated, it can be replaced by
StandardPasswordEncoder(), BCryptPasswordEncoder() and
NoOpPasswordEncoder.

The down side is the encryption is based on the username and password
(rather than just the password), so all passwords will need to be reset.
Any objections on doing this upgrade?

Cheers Greg.



Reply via email to