I'm not using folders within folders, so if this greatly simplifies code, I'm for it -- as long as we don't impact/lose any other features (i.e. the way media files work, Atom Protocol and MetaWeblog API support for media files, etc.). And of course, we handle any migration issues for people who are using folders within folders.
- Dave On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, I've earlier gotten rid of subcategories below categories and > bookmark folders under bookmark folders (for the latter, still allowing > multiple folders, although all top-level now.) In both cases, the code > shrunk considerably with the remaining code being much simpler and robust. > > I wonder if we should be doing the same for Media Files -- i.e., like > Bookmarks, allow as many top-level Media File folders as desired but remove > the ability to create subfolders under folders. (The migration for blogs > using older Roller versions, as done earlier with Bookmarks and Catgories, > will just make any subfolder a top-level folder.) Our Jenkins failures for > the past month may very well be related to this issue and we've had other > JPA headaches with Media Files in the past, so simplifying Media Files in > this manner would probably result in a more solid Roller. > > As a practical matter, those with up to a few hundred media files will not > be impacted much with this change, they can still chop up their media files > in the 10-20 top-level folders they would want. For those going beyond > that, i.e., where subfolders are likely to become handy, I view it more > likely that people will start to hold their photos on Flickr or similar > services and just embed the photos/slideshows on their blog (Flickr already > offers two nice embedding services using iframes and HTML img tags); or due > to the fact that Roller already limits media files to a single blog and not > per-blog server, store their images in a common CMS like Apache Jackrabbit > where it can be accessed by multiple blogs and other non-blog websites. In > other words, a company with 4000 images is probably not going to be > manually uploading them via Roller's Media Files functionality to each blog > needing them but just storing them centrally anyway, outside of Roller. > > Thoughts? > > Regards, > Glen > >
