I'm satisfied that he received permission. I'm not sure what header you are looking at, but when I look at it, it appears to be the correct version for ALv2 code not donated to the ASF.
Thanks, -Alex On 10/1/17, 7:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> Already done: >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c >>om%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fissues%2F16&data=02%7C01%7C%7C89b06df18446442 >>8d3c808d5093b6dfb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364250732 >>13336033&sdata=sj73IYhbDIK%2FGHjbZdbr%2FW4c%2Fj%2F1XGEnS%2FhNl%2BSesj0%3D >>&reserved=0 > >I’m not sure that "diverged enough” isn enough reason from a legal / ASF >policy point of view. > >If you look at the reply from the original author he didn’t give explicit >permission to relicense the code. "Feel free to adapt and modify the >code” is not the same as permission to relicense. > >That still leaves the header issue open. > >Thanks, >Justin > >PS any reason that GitHub issues don’t seem to be emailed to the list?
