Hi Alex, Dave, to create some Apps in Royale that conform to the actual theme is easy and while we make it with our own code it will be completly legal. This about a button. If we need to put a button that is equal to other button, we can create a CSS rule that makes that button looks almost equal to the other one, but with our own css classname. Being said that I think we don't need to create "try it now" app (for example) with the same branding, since is a tool inside, and you can see other similar efforts done by others (i.e: Typescript) where you are showing an app with a text editor and execution window. This should look as what it is...more like an editor of source code with pre and code tags and monospace fonts ;)
regarding the rest of the site. As we talked in the other thread with Harbs, we don't need to upload source code of the site (I talked in some occasions about the JIRA similarity, of a tool that we use but we don't need to expose or upload to some repo the source code). So people will want instead to generate some article, a post or an example (like flexexamples.org from Peter's blog that we want to make at some time for Royale). So we already want to give folks some easy tool to make this community effort possible. For me actual Apache CMS content is what we want to avoid, since is something cumbersome and at least for me made me does not work on this before. With the path I propose, al people that wants to make something in the site will have a WP.com user with "EDITOR" profile that will allow them to create a post or a page and make some content. To go live we regenerate the site and publish in the production url. Hope you'll find this procedure ok? I think is the way more easy and will allow us to focus on what really matters: Apache Royale source code. At the end of the day, we don't want to spend more time in the web that absolutely needed since is not the product we develop. Thanks 2017-10-24 19:50 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: > Hi Alex, > > On Oct 24, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > There is something I don't think I understand. AIUI, at some point, we > will want the Apache Royale site to include actual Royale applications, > right? And I would think we would want the styling of those applications > to be consistent with the rest of the site. So I'm not clear how we will > be able to implement the styling/theme of these Royale applications if we > don't have rights to the styling. I don't understand how WP themes and > commercial licensing works if we want to replicate that user experience > outside of WP. > > > We need to examine the static export of the CSS and HTML. > > > If we can use those visuals outside of WP, then why must we continue to > use WP to generate the site? I would hope the theme would be implemented > as CSS and some templates we could use without WP. > > > We should be able to adapt. Site building in the CMS can get complex if > needed. For OpenOffice.org we use the legacy html pulling out the title > and content body and place it within a markdown template. > > > Also, if someone wants to patch the site, they can't just offer a patch of > the HTML right? They would need to figure out where in WP it comes from? > Is there a patch process for WP content? > > > Possibly. > > > Sorry if there is some basic thing I am missing. > > > It will get complex first as we figure out how to embed and then it will > get simplified as we find the best way. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 10/24/17, 10:19 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos > Rovira" <carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of > carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > > Thanks Dave, > > I'll write an email to trademarks to start with the process. I think is > better to migrate to WP.com before continue working on content so we can > detect whatever issue we could get. > > Thanks! > > Carlos > > > > 2017-10-24 18:56 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: > > Hi Carlos, > > On Oct 24, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > just let you know that I tried to create an static version of the > > preview > > site with success. I use this plugin : > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwordpres > s.org%2Fplugins%2Fsimply-static%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb448363ee5984b3b3e0f > 08d51b0373f8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636444624020033 > 702&sdata=RPTFT7Qq0bq1AKmh1fqnLuMJ0hWIpnrieARat1lz2bk%3D&reserved=0 > > > and we can generate all static content with relative or absolute urls. > > The > > final preview site in static is 134mb > > Another thing I was searching was to use a WP to Jekyll exporter but > > this > > is not what I wanted since it seems Jekyll is all about markdown and > > we > > want a full html site with all the eye candy JS+CSS resources. In the > > end, > > and thinking more about it, is not what we want since although the > > site > > would be exported ok, we don't want to upload it to the GitHub pages > > like > > we discusses in the other thread due to expose part of the code of a > commercial wp theme. > > So, the workflow we can use is: Use the WP backend to enter new > > content > and > > modify existing want with ease (this is important is we want people > contributing here). Next, with all changes done, generate a static > > version > > and replace the entire site with a fresh generated static site at > royale.apache.org. and as well route the more friendly domain to this > > if > > board is ok with that. > > > Yes! External domain royalysdk.org is redirected to royale.apache.org as > discussed. > > > We can check with apache board or trademarks what they propose about > > to > > create a Wordpress.com <http://wordpress.com/> account managed by Apache > and migrate from my > > server > > to that account, and all this stuff from there, since if I remember > > some > > people said that would be more ok with Apache.I'd end removing my temp > subdomain after this. > > > The advantage of using the Wordpress.com <http://wordpress.com/> location > is twofold: > > (1) Wordpress keeps security up to date. > (2) If something happens to you or your company then we have better > access. > > I suspect though that with the status export method this will not be as > great a concern. > > > What do you think? Can I move this with the people we were talking > > some > > weeks ago? > > > Either you or I can email Trademarks with the plan. > > We can then discuss the redirection with Infrastructure and get the site > checked in. > > Regards, > Dave > > > Let me know in order to start making the next steps > > Thanks > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% > 2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb448363ee5984b3b3e0f08d51b0373f8%7Cfa7b1 > b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636444624020033702&sdata=1q5B1u1lLR > HGdnDh8VH9pkaTkdCPk51wt%2FCUJgzQo0c%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > -- > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeo > scopic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb448363ee5984b3b3e0f08d51b0373f8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b > 34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636444624020033702&sdata=Y%2Fkytu4lJUWu5H > zinyiNAxCBpRGAfK3GFX9REzYNI%2F0%3D&reserved=0> > > Carlos Rovira > > Director General > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 <607%2022%2060%2005> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeos > copic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb448363ee5984b3b3e0f08d51b0373f8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3 > 4438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636444624020033702&sdata=Y%2Fkytu4lJUWu5Hz > inyiNAxCBpRGAfK3GFX9REzYNI%2F0%3D&reserved=0 > > > Conocenos Avant2 en 1 minuto! > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favant2.e > s%2F%23video&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb448363ee5984b3b3e0f08d51b0373f8%7Cfa7b1b5a > 7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636444624020033702&sdata=SJmmZQTVSb0tmX > r73WVQr%2BLVhv6%2BLRMgcQyhBgOo1KI%3D&reserved=0> > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener > información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por > error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y > proceda a su destrucción. > > De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le > comunicamos > que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC > S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del > servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, > rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a > nuestras > oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación > necesaria. > > > -- <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Carlos Rovira Director General M: +34 607 22 60 05 http://www.codeoscopic.com Conocenos Avant2 en 1 minuto! <https://avant2.es/#video> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación necesaria.
